CLAUDEFORGE STUDIO

Vault — getting your PhD through research papers published

Investigating pathways to care in young people (14-25) with Borderline Personality Disorder features

This PhD thesis set out to understand how young people aged 14 to 25 with features of borderline personality disorder (BPD) move through mental health services, and why that matters given how often their needs go unrecognised. The author conducted a broad literature review drawing on several databases, covering research from 1938 to 2026, and combined it with four empirical papers. Methods included a clinical case study of four participants from the Pathways Study, who had all met criteria for neurodivergence without a diagnosis, and an interpretative phenomenological analysis of seven participants' accounts of care within the BRIDGE feasibility randomised controlled trial, which randomised 25 young people to a brief intensive intervention or usual services. Findings described barriers including stigma, poor individualised care, and lack of continuity, and showed missed opportunities for identifying BPD features. The thesis also argues for lived experience input from experts by experience. The thesis does not report the case study's findings in numerical terms, and the sample sizes are small. The author's dual role as researcher and expert by experience is acknowledged as a potential source of bias.

Alert topic
getting your PhD through research papers published
Authors
Kirsty Margaret Collins
Published in
Enlighten: Theses (The University of Glasgow) · 2026
DOI
10.5525/gla.thesis.86266
Licence
Not stated by the host we downloaded from
Free copy from
OpenAlex
Identified by
OpenAlex
Added to the vault
2026-11-12
Link last checked
2026-11-12

Two routes to the same work, and they are not equivalent. The first is the open copy this vault downloaded from, so it is the one that should open without a login, an institutional subscription or a paywall. It was confirmed reachable on 2026-11-12, with no paywall in front of it. The second is wherever the paper officially lives, which is the better citation but may well ask you to pay.

A daily literature alert for getting your PhD through research papers published surfaced this paper. The trail below is the rest of the story — which service matched the alert’s title to a real bibliographic record, and every host tried while hunting a copy anyone can open. It is on the page for the same reason the licence is: so the provenance can be checked rather than taken on trust.

  1. Picked up from a daily alert for getting your PhD through research papers published
  2. Identified in OpenAlex
  3. Alert link — no open-access copy listed
  4. arXiv — no open-access copy listed
  5. OpenAlex — ok

Following this paper’s own citations turned up 2 further sources with a free copy, so they have a page here too:

The vault holds 3 papers under this topic. The ones nearest this one:

This is a pointer, not the paper. The vault is fed by daily literature alerts: anything scholarly that turns out to have a legally free copy gets a page here, carrying a summary, the licence it was released under, and a link that is re-checked on a schedule so it cannot rot quietly. Nothing is republished — the PDF stays wherever its publisher or repository put it, and every link above points back there.

The summary at the top was written by a language model from the paper’s own abstract and has not been checked by a specialist. Read it as a signpost and the paper as the source. Nothing here is medical, legal, electrical or engineering advice, and a paper appearing in this vault is a record that it exists, not an endorsement of what it concludes.

← The vault